Operators Join Forces to Tackle Mobile Spam
Operators Join Forces to Tackle Mobile Spam
The GSM Association is now working on a code of practice to help further reduce the occurrence of mobile SPAM by putting in place new contractual and process checks to identify SPAM that originates both on and off network.
Tina Southall from Vodafone is quoted as saying that mobile SPAM from SMS and MMS messages can be managed down to 1% compared to 70% of all e-mail traffic.
But what about the other half of the planet? This code is for all GSM operators, but what about the CDMA operators like Sprint and Verizon? Should we expect to see something similar coming from CTIA or other?
But what constitutes SPAM?
Yes - what is SPAM as part of this definition? And more importantly, does that align with the consumer's idea of what is SPAM?
I would suggest that a significant percentage of the messages that are reported as being mobile SPAM can be traced back to a point where a consumer failed to read terms and conditions appropriately and that they have actually given their opt-in permission.
Most consumers complain that a message is SPAM if a message interrupts their day in a way that does not add value. If it's not TRVR - Timely, Relevant, Valuable and Requested - it's probably going to be perceived as being SPAM.
As there is a significant chance that the operators will control the flow of blatant SPAM, I'd like to see a "bigger picture" approach put forth to educate marketers about how to ensure that their communications are not perceived as being SPAM.


0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home