MMS messaging contineus to suffer.

160Characters Association
Back in July/August 2003 - when the hype about MMS picture messaging was at it's peak - there were a number of us that were standing back from all the media frenzy and trying to get an objective view on the market question: Would MMS really take off in Europe as it had in Japan?
Although mobile network operators were keen to have something to tell the market as to how they were going to recover the Billions spent on 3G licenses - there were several of us who were refusing to Drink the Kool-Aid.
The article here from 160characters.org points out clearly that volumes are trivial in comparison to the volume of SMS messages and I don't expect that will change anytime soon. The price of MMS being 4x that of SMS is one barrier - but I still question if you made the price the same as SMS if it would change consumer behviour.
Sending an SMS is easy. Anyone can do it from virtually any phone. Composing an MMS is more difficult unless it's just sending a picture. And the process takes time - you don't just write and hit Send - you have to compose - send - wait for transimission - it's just not the fast and easy experience of SMS.
However, MMS for Mobile Marketing now that is a different animal altogether. In this case I think the business case makes much more sense and the ability for brands to communicate with consumers including pictures and audio is very compelling. Not as costly as streaming video - more accessible than today's consumers who can receive MobileTV - and overall a better experience than mobile SMS marketing.
I would say that 2006 could see a growth in MMS marketing that will surprise people because the media have everyone focused on the latest drip feed of Kool-aid - Mobile TV.


0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home