Verizon says No Spam for Thanksgiving
Looks like Verizon is taking the high road and pursuing another of those aggressive marketers for sending 93,000 SPAM messages. And although the article doesn't say it expressly - we can only guess that the access to the Verizon network was through their e-mail to SMS gateway.
I've written about the US carriers using e-mail to SMS gateways and the huge problems that they cause in SPAM - and the huge investment they are making in buying e-mail anti-SPAM solutions.
All you have to do is turn them off!
There are a number of legitimate solutions for allowing businesses to access the Verizon network for sending messages - and an e-mail to SMS gateway just isn't the best one.
If it weren't for those "few pennies" they receive from every message that is sent Verizon would shut these access points down.
Ok - so that may not be completely true - it is possible that the carriers are still trying to encourage adoption of business use for SMS messaging. And the best way to do that would be to make the messages FREE through an aggregator for this period of time. Why don't we put this in the suggestion box and see if it floats? It is the season for giving - and New Year is always a good time to change!
But what about the aggregators?
Ah yes - the problem of the aggregators. Each of these businesses would need to have an account with the aggregators and they would need a way to make some money. Why don't the operators just redirect their e-mail SPAM license cost to subsidize the aggegators during this time? That would work? (I'm thinking we are actually close to a solution here...)
"But Troy - Tell me again why all the fuss?"
If we keep the e-mail to SMS gateways open we will always run the risk that some SPAM will get through. We have the entire world of SPAMmers out there who all know exactly how to send messages through the e-mail to SMS gateways.
If you force everyone to connect through an aggregator you close the huge gaping hole in the network and offer an environment that is much more closely controlled and this results in much less SPAM.
Furthermore, this leads the carriers down the path of moving businesses and others towards a pay-to-send model going forward. It's the first in a multi-phased approach.
What do you think?


0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home