MobHappy: BT Launches a Whole Range of Terribly Boring LBS Services
Russel writes about BT and their new LBS services... but not very positively.
He's right - much of the stuff is only barely "yawn worthy" - when I can think of one thing that would make LBS sense immediately - and it doesn't even require detailed positioning information.
When I'm in Spokane, WA (that's in the US, you know) I don't need to know that the Piccadilly line is having minor delays - especially when that comes at 3AM as a TEXT message sent to my phone.
Can't we use LBS for something sensible?
Of course - the answer is - Not really... These LBS services will cost probably cost a lot... and who knows how easy it will be to integrate them with existing applications.
Paying for accuracy
About 18 months ago I was having a meeting with T-Mobile and we were talking about their LBS offering. What I found most interesting was that their engineers had developed at "inaccurracy" solution.
With T-Mobile you paid a different amount for a different level of accuracy in determining location. As it turns out the accuracy was much more dependent upon the type of LBS that was deployed than on what the person paid for. As a result it is possible that you could have 2 meter accuracy but have only paid for 1 Km accuracy.
So what did T-Mobile do? - They introduced error into the result. If you got a result that was accurate to 2 meters then they would randomly add noise to that result to where it was never more than the accuracy you paid for.
This drives engineers crazy. The engineers have spent years perfecting a solution only to have someone on the commercial side tell them it's "too good" and that they'll need to make it worse to make it commercially viable.
On the one hand I hope we see a lot more LBS - on the other I don't think we will because the costs and technology and interfaces still have another 24-36 months before they become common enough for applicatoin providers to use.
(And if you're an accountant - and you think about the fact that 5 years is about the time that it would take to depreciate the LBS equipment that operators were required to install to support E911/999/111 services - you'll see why I think there is another 24-36 months of high prices and no adoption.)


0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home